Treze princípios para controlar a vigilância apresentados em reunião da ONU

Today Lavits (Latin American Network of Surveillance, Technology and Society Studies), GpopaiTransMediar / Pimentalab and Instituto Nupefoin a huge international coalition in calling upon Latin American countries to assess whether national surveillance laws and activities are in line with their international human rights obligations.

We have endorsed a set of international principles against unchecked surveillance. The 13 Principles set out for the first time an evaluative framework for assessing surveillance practices in the context of international human rights obligations.

A group of civil society organizations officially presented the 13 Principles this past Friday in Geneva at a side event attended by Navi Pillay, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and Opinion, Frank LaRue, during the 24th session of the Human Rights Council. The side event was hosted by the Permanent Missions of Austria, Germany, Liechtenstein, Norway, Switzerland and Hungary.

Brazilian scenario

The problem with the proliferation of surveillance mechanisms in Brazil is broad and complex. It appears from the action of the State as a voracious collector – and lousy keeper – of personal and biometric data of citizens even in conflict, especially class disputes, within civil society itself. It is happening through devices that collect images and other data that govern access to private spaces. With the digitalization of processes, this issue has become even more complex. Recently, it was been revealed that the national electoral authority had signed an agreement that would allow access to the data of all Brazilian voters by a private credit referencing company (called Serasa and linked to the multinational Experian). The country lacks legislation to give protection to personal data stored electronically and a recent attempt to issue a bill with this purpose has been attacked by lobbyists and postponed indefinitely. At the same time, more recently, the state itself and national companies were exposed as victims of spying by the National Security Agency of the United States. Business and political leaders are poorly aware of the fragility of the security of electronic communications currently in use in the country, and public debate on the issue and its implications is still very rare and limited to academia and activists.

The launching of the “International Principles on the Application of Human Rights to Communications Surveillance” comes at a very crucial moment for Latin American countries, especially Brazil, which still has a legal vacuum regarding the protection of human rights in the context of digital communications. At least three recent important cases emphasize the urgent need to promote actions and public debate on the topics covered by these Principles: the leaked evidences that the Brazilian government and companies have been systematically targeted by spying programs of the National Security Agency of the United States; the expansion on the use of surveillance technologies and practices in order to respond to international standards demanded by the coming sporting megaevents – specially the World Cup and the Olympics; and recent cases of monitoring, surveillance and criminalization, by state governments in Brazil, of the participants of political protests started in June 2013. We highlight the importance of the notion of “protected information”, that relates to different modes of data communication, beyond the meanings of content disclosure, which can provide, today, important and sensitive information about individuals. Finally, it is worth mentioning the importance of strengthening mechanisms to ensure the protection of personal data and human rights within communication, not only against intrusions of the state, but also from commercial interests of the private sector, as well as increasingly often and complex alliances, between the state and non-state actors.

The recently revealed cases of NSA spying on nation-states has been turned into an intense debate in Brazil, specially because of evidences that high-rank members of the Brazilian government were a common target, including emails and phone calls of the President Dilma Rousseff, and the public company Petrobras (one of the most important and biggest oil companies in the world). Monitoring over Petrobras clearly demonstrates the strategic and economic use of spying practices by state agencies, like the NSA, to build obscure competitive advantages to its host states. This case was discovered just as the company was organizing the initial auction of oil reserves in 2006. Access to information about Petrobras and the auction might have influenced the bids and created an unbalanced dispute for the companies participating in the process. The targeted surveillance over the Brazilian government and Petrobras has heavily impacted the relations between Brazil and the United States. President Dilma Rousseff has even cancelled a previously scheduled official visit to the United States that was to happen next October.
Pronouncements in the international context

Navi Pillay, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, speaking at the Human Rights Council stated in her opening statement on September 9:

“Laws and policies must be adopted to address the potential for dramatic intrusion on individuals’ privacy which have been made possible by modern communications technology.”

Navi Pillay, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, speaking at the event, said that:

“technological advancements have been powerful tools for democracy by giving access to all to participate in society, but increasing use of data mining by intelligence agencies blurs lines between legitimate surveillance and arbitrary mass surveillance.”

Frank La Rue, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and Opinion made clear the case for a direct relationship between state surveillance, privacy and freedom of expression in this latest report to the Human Rights Council:

“The right to privacy is often understood as an essential requirement for the realization of the right to freedom of expression. Undue interference with individuals’ privacy can both directly and indirectly limit the free development and exchange of ideas. … An infringement upon one right can be both the cause and consequence of an infringement upon the other.”

Speaking at the event, the UN Special Rapporteur remarked that:

“previously surveillance was carried out on targeted basis but the Internet has changed the context by providing the possibility for carrying out mass surveillance. This is the danger.”

Find out more about the Principles at https://NecessaryandProportionate.org